Stephen Miller calls whistleblower a ‘partisan hit job’ in fiery interview

Stephen Miller calls whistleblower a ‘partisan hit job’ in fiery interview

Posted by


>>Chris: KEVIN CORKE REPORTING FROM THE WHITE HOUSE, THANKS FOR THAT. JOINING US NOW, STEPHEN MILLER, SENIOR ADVISOR TO THE PRESIDENT, WELCOME BACK TO “FOX NEWS SUNDAY.”>>THANKS FOR HAVING ME, CHRIS.>>Chris: LET’S START WITH THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC SUBPOENAS OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF A MASSIVE SET OF DOCUMENTS AS WELL AS FIVE WITNESSES FOR THIS WEEK. IT WILL PRESIDENT TRUMP COMPLY WITH THE HOUSE SUBPOENA?>>TO>>Stephen: THAT’S GOING TO BE BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT’S ATTORNEYS, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL’S OFFICE AND THE HOUSE COMMITTEE. I HAVE NO NEWS UNFORTUNATELY TO MAKE ON THAT ISSUE BUT WHAT I DO WANT TO SAY IS THAT I THINK IT’S UNFORTUNATE THAT THE MEDIA CONTINUES TO DESCRIBE THIS INDIVIDUAL IS A WHISTLE-BLOWER AND HONORIFIC THAT THIS INDIVIDUAL MOST CERTAINLY DOES NOT DESERVE. A PARTISAN HIT JOB DOES NOT MAKE YOU A WHISTLE-BLOWER JUST BECAUSE YOU GO THROUGH THE WHISTLE-BLOWER PROTECTION ACT.>>Chris: WELL, FIRST OF ALL, HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THIS IS A PARTISAN HIT JOB, AND HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THIS IS NOT A WHISTLE-BLOWER IN FACT UNDER DNI, THE DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE RULES — WELL, YOU KNOW WHAT, LET’S GO BACK TO THIS, AND WE’RE GOING TO JUMP AROUND A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE I DIDN’T KNOW YOU WERE GOING TO GO HERE. HERE IS THE COMMENT FROM THE DNI, THE ACTING DNI BEFORE CONGRESS, JOE MAGUIRE, IN HIS TESTIMONY THIS WEEK, TAKE A LOOK.>>I BELIEVE THAT THE WHISTLE-BLOWER AND THE INSPECTOR GENERAL HAVE ACTED IN GOOD FAITH THROUGHOUT. I HAVE EVERY REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THEY HAVE DONE EVERYTHING BY THE BOOK AND FOLLOW THE LAW.>>Chris: THAT IS THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, JOE MAGUIRE, A LIFETIME SERVANT OF THIS COUNTRY, A NAVY SEAL, HE SAYS THAT THE WHISTLE-BLOWER WAS ACTING IN GOOD FAITH AND ACTION BY THE BOOK. ON WHAT BASIS DO YOU SAY THAT THIS WAS A PARTISAN HIT JOB?>>Stephen: FIRST OF ALL, IF YOU READ THE SEVEN-PAGE NANCY DREW NOVEL FOR THE WHISTLE-BLOWER PUT TOGETHER, IT DRIPS WITH CONDESCENSION, RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION AND CONTEMPT FOR THE PRESIDENT. IT’S ALSO LUDICROUS ON ITS FACE. IT DESCRIBES AN ELABORATE COVER-UP THAT ALSO, BY THE WAY, THE PRESIDENT DISCUSSED ON SEAN HANNITY, APRIL 25TH. WHAT KIND OF SECRET COVER OF ARE YOU ALSO DISCUSSING ON THE AIRWAVES OF FOX NEWS? FURTHERMORE, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL FOUND EVIDENCE OF POLITICAL BIAS IN THE INDIVIDUAL, WHICH IS NOT DISPUTED BY ANYBODY –>>Chris: WAIT A MINUTE. HE ALSO — BOTH THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INSPECTOR GENERAL SAID THEY ALSO FOUND HIS COMMENTS TO BE CREDIBLE AND A MATTER OF URGENT CONCERN AND THEY TURNED IT OVER TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, SO DESPITE ALL THAT, THEY THOUGHT THAT THIS WAS A CREDIBLE — A COMPLAINT.>>Stephen: AND THEY ARE WRONG.>>Chris: ON WHOSE BASIS?>>Stephen: I WORK IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NOW FOR NEARLY THREE YEARS. I KNOW AT THE DEEP STATE LOOKS LIKE. I KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHISTLE-BLOWER AND A DEEP STATE OPERATIVE. THIS IS A DEEP STATE OPERATIVE, PURE AND SIMPLE. PEOPLE WHO HAVEN’T BEEN IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WHO HAVEN’T WORKED IN THE WHITE HOUSE MEMO MAY NOT APPRECIATE THIS BUT THE SITUATION AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF UNTUATION AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF UNELATION AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF UNELECION AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF UNELECTON AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF UNELECTED AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF BUREAUCRATS WHO THINK THAT THEY NEED TO TAKE DOWN THIS PRESIDENT. I’LL ATTEND INTERAGENCY MEETINGS WHERE I KNOW FOR CERTAIN FACT IF I DON’T BUY THE RIGHT PEOPLE AT THE MEETING WILL LEAK. IF I DON’T SAY THE RIGHT THING, IT WILL GO TO THE HILL. IF WE PROPOSE A POLICY IDEA THAT THEY DON’T APPROVE OF, THEY WILL WORK WITH DEMOCRATIC APPROPRIATORS TO TRY TO BLOCK IT. IF THEY LICK THIS PRESIDENT’S PHONE CALLS, THE PUBLISHER HIT PIECES, THEY PUBLISH FAKE STORIES. THEY’VE BEEN DOING THIS CONTINUOUSLY FOR NEARLY THREE YEARS AND THEIR MOTIVES AND THEIR AGENDA IS CLEAR. THIS IS ABOUT DO YOU WANT A DEMOCRACY IN THIS COUNTRY OR DO YOU WANT A DEEP STATE. IT’S A BINARY CHOICE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.>>Chris: AGAIN, THIS PERSON YOU ARE ACCUSING THEM ALL THE SCUM OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, JOE MAGUIRE, A LIFELONG SERVANT OF THIS COUNTRY SAID WAS ACTING IN GOOD FAITH AND GOING BY THE BOOK. ENOUGH WITH THE RHETORIC, LET’S TALK ABOUT SOME SPECIFIC FACTS IN THIS. WHY DID PRESIDENT TRUMP USES PRIVATE ATTORNEY RUDY GIULIANI, AND AS WE JUST REPORTED, TO OTHER PRIVATE LAWYERS TO TRY TO DIG UP DIRT FROM THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT ON JOE BIDEN RATHER THAN GOING THROUGH HIS STATE DEPARTMENT?>>Stephen: FIRST OF ALL, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, WHEN WE COULD TALK ABOUT “DIGGING UP DIRT,” IT’S AN INTERESTING CHOICE OF WORDS. ONE OF TWO THINGS IS TRUE, CHRIS. EITHER THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT, OR PEOPLE ASSOCIATED WITH IT, POSSESS A REAL AND ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF CORRUPT DEALINGS BY THE BIDEN FAMILY, OR THEY DON’T. IF THEY DO, IS IT NOT IN THE INTEREST OF ALL AMERICANS TO KNOW THAT IS?>>Chris: WE ARE GOING TO GET TO THE BIDEN’S IN A MINUTE BUT I ASK YOU A SPECIFIC QUESTION, I’D LIKE A SPECIFIC ANSWER. THE PRESIDENT HAS THE STATE DEPARTMENT, HE’S GOT THE CIA, HE’S GOT THE PENTAGON, HE’S GOT A NUMBER OF OTHER AGENCIES. WHY DID HE USE THREE PRIVATE LAWYERS TO GET INFORMATION ON BIDEN FROM THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT RATHER THAN GO THROUGH ALL OF THE AGENCIES OF HIS GOVERNMENT?>>Stephen: TWO DIFFERENT POINTS.>>Chris: HOW ABOUT ANSWERING MY QUESTION?>>Stephen: JOHN DURHAM, AS YOU KNOW –>>Chris: WAIT A MINUTE, JOHN DURHAM IS INVESTIGATING SOME A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. I’M ASKING YOU A DIRECT QUESTION, WHAT ARE THE PRESIDENT USE PRIVATE ATTORNEYS RATHER THAN GO TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT? IF YOU DON’T KNOW, THAT’S AN ACCEPTABLE ANSWER, BUT LET’S NOT TALK ABOUT JOHN DURHAM, WHO WAS INVESTIGATING THE TRUMP — SPEECH OF THEIR TWO ISSUES –>>Chris: WHY DID HE DO IT?>>Stephen: I UNDERSTAND. I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAVE YOUR QUESTION, I HAVE MY ANSWER. THERE’S TWO ISSUES THAT WERE BROUGHT UP A PHONE CALL –>>Chris: IT’S A NONANSWER AT THIS POINT.>>Stephen: THERE WERE TWO ISSUES BROUGHT UP IN THE PHONE CALL. ONE WAS UKRAINIAN KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE NATURE OF THE COLLUSION INVESTIGATION THAT IS INFLICTED SO MUCH PAIN AND DAMAGE ON OUR COUNTRY. MY POINT IS THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS APPOINTED SOMEBODY FROM THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO LOOK INTO THAT ISSUE. THEN THERE’S THE ADDITIONAL MATTER OF UKRAINIAN CORRUPTION, WHICH GIULIANI, AMONG OTHERS, ARE LOOKING AT. AND IT IS PROPER AND NATURAL FOR FRANKLY ANYBODY CONCERNED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF UKRAINE AND THE UNITED STATES TO WANT TO KNOW INFORMATION ABOUT CORRUPT DEALINGS. WHAT I FIND ASTONISHING, CHRIS, IS THAT THE PEOPLE THAT ARE SO ENRAGED ABOUT AN EFFORT TO FIND ANY TRUE AND ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF FOREIGN CROOK DEALINGS RELATED TO UKRAINE ARE THE SAME ONES WHO HAVE BEEN USING THE FOREIGN PRODUCED DOSSIER BY A BRITISH SPY TO PUT THIS COUNTRY THROUGH UNENDING POLITICAL TURMOIL. SPIRIT I’M ASKING QUESTION AS TO WHY — I’M SIMPLY ASKING YOU A QUESTION AS TO WHY THE PRESIDENT DIDN’T USE HIS GOVERNMENT. IF YOU APPARENTLY ARE NOT GOING TO ANSWER THAT, I WILL ASK ANOTHER QUESTION. WHY DID THE PRESIDENT DECIDE TO WITHHOLD $391 MILLION IN MILITARY AID TO UKRAINE LAST JULY? THAT HAD BEEN APPROVED BY CONGRESS?>>Stephen: THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN CLEAR AND CONSISTENT ON THIS ISSUE, NOT MERELY FOR THE TIME IS BEEN IN OFFICE, HIS WHOLE TIME AS A CANDIDATE AND FRANKLY DECADES BEFORE THAT.>>Chris: I SIMPLY ASKING WHY IN JULY DID THEY DECIDE TO WITHHOLD THE AID?>>Stephen: THE PROBLEM OF BURDEN SHARING IN UKRAINE AND WITH OUR NATO ALLIES, HE’S BEEN CLEAR AND CONSISTENT ON THIS ISSUE. PLUS THE MATTER OF UKRAINIAN CORRUPTION. FOR REASONS I CANNOT FATHOM, THE MEDIA, WHICH IS ORDINARILY INTERESTED IN SUNSHINE AND TRANSPARENCY ABOVE ALL ELSE, IS REMARKABLY UNSERIOUS ABOUT THE INFORMATION UKRAINE POSSESSES ABOUT THE CORRUPTION OF THE PREVIOUS AT ADMINISTRATION –>>Chris: OKAY, BUT LET’S JUST MAKE THIS POINT. IN MAY, AS PART OF A REGULAR INTERAGENCY PROCESS, IN MAY, TWO MONTHS BEFORE HE WITHHELD THE AID, THE PENTAGON CERTIFIED TO CONGRESS — CERTIFIED, A FORMAL PROCESS — CERTIFIED TO CONGRESS AFTER A RIGOROUS PROCESS AND AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT THAT UKRAINE HAD MADE DRAMATIC PROGRESS IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION AND THAT THE AID SHOULD BE RELEASED. WHY DID THE PRESIDENT, IF THE ARGUMENT IS CORRUPTION, WHY DID THE PRESIDENT GO AGAINST HIS OWN PENTAGON AND HIS OWN STATE DEPARTMENT?>>Stephen: CHRIS, I DON’T UNDERSTAND HOW YOU CAN ASK A UNDERSTAND HOW YOU CAN ASK K UNDERSTAND HOW YOU CAN ASK T UNDERSTAND HOW YOU CAN ASK E QUESTION WHILE AT THE SAME TIME ADMONISHING THE PRESIDENT OR WANTING TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF PERHAPS ONE OF THE BIGGEST CORRUPTION SCANDALS CONCERNING UKRAINE IN THE LAST FEW YEARS –>>Chris: ARE NOT ADMONISHING ANYBODY, ABSENTLY ASKING WHY DID HE — I MEAN THIS IS — WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, THIS IS AN EXERCISE IN OBFUSCATION. WHY DID THE PRESIDENT GO AGAINST HIS OWN PENTAGON AND STATE DEPARTMENT?>>Stephen: THERE’S A TONE OF JUDGMENT IN ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS, SO YES, YOU ARE ADMONISHING –>>Chris: THAT’S JUDGMENT ON YOUR PART.>>Stephen: I CAN’T SPEAK TO EVERY MID-LEVEL AND LOW LEVEL BUREAUCRAT IN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT –>>Chris: THIS IS THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. WHAT YOU CONSIDERED JOHN BROOD A MINYAN IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT? IN A PENTAGON?>>Stephen: IT’S THE PRESIDENT ‘HIS JOB AND SWORN DUTY TO SAFEGUARD TAXPAYER DOLLARS AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT’S FOREIGN POLICY. GETTING TO THE BOTTOM OF A CORRUPTION SCANDAL IN UKRAINE IS IN THE AMERICAN NATIONAL INTEREST IF YOU WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHY THAT COMPLAINT IS SO OBVIOUSLY POLITICALLY BIASED, WHEN HE SAYS THAT THE PRESIDENT IS THREATENING NATIONAL SECURITY BY TRYING TO EXPOSE CORRUPTION — WHEN HE SAYS, OR SHE, THAT THE PRESIDENT IS HURTING NATIONAL SECURITY BY TRYING TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF A GIGANTIC SCANDAL THAT NOBODY HAS ON EARTH, THE PRESIDENT IS THE WHISTLE-BLOWER HERE. THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS THE WHISTLE-BLOWER IN THIS INDIVIDUAL IS A SABOTEUR TRYING TO UNDERMINE A DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENT.>>Chris: SABOTEUR, IS HE A SPY? IS A COMMITTING TREASON?>>Stephen: I DO NOT KNOW –>>Chris: THE PRESIDENT SAID THAT, YOU KNOW.>>Stephen: THE PRESIDENT CORRECTLY POINTED OUT THAT THE BEHAVIOR OF THIS INDIVIDUAL IS CLOSE TO A SPY. I DON’T KNOW WHO THE INDIVIDUAL IS, ALL I KNOW IS AT SOME POINT, CHRIS, WE HAVE TO FOCUS THE REAL SCANDAL, WHICH IS THREE YEARS OF DEEP STATE SABOTAGE.>>Chris: I’M GOING TO TALK ABOUT A DIFFERENT SCANDAL AND YOU’LL BE VERY HAPPY THAT I’M HEADED A TEAR. THE PRESIDENT SAYS THE REAL STORY IS THE CORRUPTION BY VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN AND HIS SON HUNTER BIDEN, WHO WAS ON THE BOARD OF THE UKRAINIAN ENERGY COMPANY. HOW, SPECIFICALLY — I’M GOING TO GIVE YOU ONE MINUTE UNINTERRUPTED — HOW SPECIFICALLY TO THE BIDENS BREAK THE LAW IN UKRAINE?>>Stephen: THE BURISMA COMPANY, AS YOU KNOW, WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION. IT HAS A UKRAINIAN OLIGARCH BEHIND IT WHO WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION. WE KNOW THAT THERE WAS SEVERE CONCERNING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OF THE TIME ABOUT BIDEN BEING APPOINTED AS THE LEAD ON UKRAINIAN POLICY AND HIS SON GETTING A LUCRATIVE $50,000 A MONTH DEAL WITH THE COMPANY. THE SUN HAD NO EXPERIENCE IN THE LEGAL ISSUES –>>Chris: HOW DID YOU BREAK THE LAW?>>Stephen: KNEW NOTHING ABOUT UKRAINIAN LAW AND NOTHING ABOUT NATURAL GAS, THE ISSUE OF THE HEART OF THE COMPANY. THE BIDEN MEN THREATENED TO WITHHOLD A BILLION DOLLARS IN AID UNLESS THE PROSECUTOR WAS FIRED.>>Chris: YOU REALIZE THAT ALSO THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, ALMOST EVERY OTHER GOVERNMENT IN THE WEST WAS ALSO ASKING FOR THAT PROSECUTOR TO BE FIRED AND THAT IN FACT, IN FACT, THERE WAS NO INVESTIGATION GOING ON OF BURISMA, THE NAME OF THE COMPANY AT THAT TIME.>>Stephen: I DON’T KNOW THAT TO BE TRUE.>>Chris: IT IS TRUE.>>Stephen: I KNOW WHAT PEOPLE HAVE SAID BUT THE REALITY IS THAT WHY IS THE MEDIA SO OBSESSED WITH EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THIS INVESTIGATION BUT THEY DON’T WANT TO UNCOVER THE POTENTIAL CORRUPT DEALINGS OF HUNTER BIDEN AND HIS FATHER?>>Chris: I HAVE ONE LESS QUESTION TO ASK YOU AND I DO WANT TO PUT THIS ON –>>Stephen: WHILE THORNTON ABOUT CHINA?>>Chris: HERE IS THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL OF UKRAINE FOR THREE YEARS, INCLUDING THE PERIOD DURING WHICH PRESIDENT TRUMP SPOKE WITH PRESIDENT ZELENSKY IN JULY OF 2019. HERE HE IS THIS WEEK. TAKE A LOOK.>>I DON’T KNOW ANY VIOLATION OF UKRAINIAN LAW — ONCE AGAIN, UKRAINIAN LAW, BY BIDEN AND BIDEN JR.>>Chris: HE WAS THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL AT THE TIME THE PRESIDENT CALLED THE UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT — SAYS JOE BIDEN AND HIS SON DID NOTHING WRONG.>>Chris: IF YOU’RE GOING TO USE THEM AS A WITNESS YOU HAVE TO ALSO ANALOGIES MADE INCREDIBLY DAMNING ALLEGATIONS AGAINST UKRAINE AND THE GOVERNMENT INVOLVING THE ORIGINS OF THE 2016 RUSSIAN COLLUSION EXPERIENCE E. IF YOU’RE GOING TO USE A WITNESS YOU HAVE TO TAKE ALL OF IT ARE NONE OF IT. YOU CAN’T PICK AND CHOOSE, IT’S NOT A BUFFET.>>Chris: OKAY, BUT I GUESS THE POINT IS IF HE IS CLEARLY SAYING THOSE THINGS ABOUT UKRAINE AND THE 2016 ELECTION, HE’S NOT CARRYING WATER FOR JOE BIDEN, HE SAYS JOE BIDEN — YOU CAN’T PICK OR CHOOSE EITHER.>>Stephen: I’M NOT.>>Chris: YOUR SAYING “WE AGREE WITH HIM ON THIS BUT WE DON’T ON THE OTHER.” WELCOME TO THE BUFFET.>>Stephen: I’M SAYING AN INVESTIGATION IS URGENTLY NEEDED WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE PATTERN OF FACTS BUT THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT POINT IS THIS. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN 2016 SAID WE WANT IN A COMPLETELY NEW DIRECTION FOR OUR COUNTRY. THEY ELECTED NEW LAWMAKERS AND THEY ELECTED A NEW PRESIDENT TO DELIVER THAT DIRECTION. HE’S THE THE SOLE ELECTED PERSON IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH.>>Chris: THAT’S NOT TRUE. IT GOT THE VICE PRESIDENT AS WELL.>>Stephen: YES. THE ALL EXECUTIVE POWER IS VESTED IN THE PRESIDENT BUT THERE ARE DEEP STATE OPERATIVES WHO FOR THREE YEARS HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT TRY TO LEAK, UNDERMINE, HURT, AND HARM THE ABILITY OF THIS PRESIDENT TO INSTITUTE THIS CHANGE. DO WE WANT TO BE GOVERNED BY AN UNELECTED BUREAUCRACY OR BY A DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT? IS THE SOLE ISSUE FACING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.>>Chris: THE ONLY POINT I WOULD MAKE IT, AND I HAVE TO MOVE ON, IS THAT IN 2018, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ELECTED

100 comments

  1. Conservatives should do the same crap (as karma) as the Democrats does: Fake whistleblowers to impeachments all the time a Democrat-president is chosen by the people.
    It's hurting the country though, wasting tax-payer's money.

  2. Wallace is giving credence to the "whistleblower", by calling the DNI a lifelong servant of this country, all well and good, maybe. How can they call him a credible whistleblower when they've already identified him as having a bias?

  3. Stephen Miller is such an oily weasel.
    Shudder.😣
    He needs to crawl back under his rock because he's doing Trump no favors at all.
    He's like the prohpet to the antichrist 🙄

  4. Chris Wallace is a hit-piece! It won't let Mr Miller answer, because the answer doesn't fit Wallace's narrative.

  5. Wallace started down the DNI report realizing oh! They just changed those whistle blower rules! Better not go there, and he didn’t go there! Hey Chris? That what you refer to as bias! You bias bastard!

  6. Like listening to fingernails on a chalkboard, can Chris Wallace’s tone of conduit in this interview be more annoying?

  7. I wish miller Would just reach across the table and slap that silly son of a b****'s and telling you know exactly why now shut your mouth

  8. Wallace is getting more and more biased it wont be long until he moves over to CNN. America is catching on to his real motives. Just another poverty loving Democratic Socialist who want to sellout America.

  9. stephen miller is so condescending. For someone so young he sure is on the wrong path. History will not treat him well and parents must be so embarrassed to have that idiot for a son.

  10. Hey Steven—- Why don't you quit this gig and go back to playing shitty music—we don't miss assholes like you !!!!!!

  11. "Why is the media upset with every aspect of this investigation?"

    Because it was an underhanded request, made through pressure by withholding allocated funds, and through non-government officials who probably don't even have enough clearance to know about this interaction much less be the front runners of it.

  12. Chrissy boy is way too connected to the Martha's vineyard clique. Get out on the road Chrissy and get to know the heart of America. You have grown dull predictable and irrelevant

  13. Stephen Miller did a great job exposing the hypocrisy of Chris Wallace and the preponderance of yellow journalism in our fake news media.

  14. the greater the lie, the more people will believe in it. the current administration using national socialist tactics but we're the arsenal and birth of modern democracy so act like a patriot and preserve the constitution. stephen miller seems like a harry potter valdemortian snake..

  15. I tell you why he chose Giuliani. He trust his personal lawyer instead of a potential deep state corrupt investigator

  16. :“You’ll get 1 minute uninterrupted”:
    ::Absolutely no one::
    :::Chris, LITERALLY <27 seconds later::: “how durp he break the law durp”

  17. How can any “sane” person not see that this guy Miller is a total psychopath! He should be tried for treason, and executed!

  18. President Trump chose not to use the corrupt government intel agencies and FBI that have been trying to take him down for three years. You figure it out, Mr Wallace

  19. When you guys talk about bias, you may have your own bias, everyone of us has some sort of bias. What I saw from this interview is that the guy just refused to answer questions from the host. That is the problem, simple and clear. If you think you’re right, why not just answer the questions? It is the chance you can convince people who have the same question. If you don’t answer, I may think you’re hiding something and I will have bias on you then.

  20. chris wallace is a punk who keeps interrupting whenever he does not like what other person is saying and a fraud like him should be on fake news cnn so only 3 or 4 people have to put up with his crap just because someone is in goverment a long time does not mean they are not corrupt in fact it is more likely they owe favors the longer they are in goverment TRUMP 2020

  21. Came here to see if anyone could actually try to defend Stephen Miller, one of the worst people in history. Sadly, such enablers/bootlickers do exist and it makes me sad for humanity

  22. Wallace is a partisan hack working for the DNC and the deep state! He is a puppet of the Amoeba's in the MSM and the Paul Ryan's of the Fox News corp! Great Job Miller!!

  23. This guy needs to be hung by his feet with trump,and have their balls cut off ! I feel so sorry for the U S public . OH I AM SORRY TRUMP DOES NOT HAVE ANY BALLS !!!!!

  24. Trump used his own lawyers because he cannot trust the CIA, FBI and other who are intense on taking him down they are all part of attempted coup. I dont blame him for not trusting the Intelligence agency. Look what they been trying to oust him for the last 3 years already, need anymore evidence?"

  25. True.. Schiff gonna up the ante by stacking the deck.. This is Kavanough all over again. When is enough ..enough?? Wallace has his blinders on and plays ignorant, how can Wallace be in such a position and not see the obvious that the Dems, specifically, Schiff..that this is DS political hit job ..the playbook is exactly the same. If Wallace was told the WB is "Blasley Ford" he would find a way to defend it .
    Wallace is a sell out..he's Been compromised..

  26. Chris Wallace is insufficiently informed about Guilian's work on the Biden family corruption. He was asked by by US State Dept to go to Ukraine. Yours truly already know more than Wallace.

  27. 100% agree with Stephen Miller. The idiots traitors Crooked mouth Chris Wallace is the leftist radical criminal crimes always against our president Trump!! Chris Wallace is a Commie!!

  28. Republicans=SCUM,disgusting human beings,lowest form of slime,people in this country you must go and vote every one of these snakes out of office you see what goes on when you give them power.WAKE THE HELL UP PEOPLE.W.T.F.

  29. Wallace,well prepared to defend the Biden's just like a dog defending his food 😝 I puke every time I see him 😝

  30. Wallace is a real weasel. He asks questions then immediately interrupts Miller as soon as he starts to answer. Despicable.

  31. What a lame apparatchik for the Deep State..Wallace is either really ignorant of the infestation of Globalist Commies at the DoJ or he intentionally aids and abets the traitors. Stephen Miller is terrific. His commentary of what's going on..outing the enemy within… is at..Headlines with a voice.

  32. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE TO CUT THE DEEP STATE HEAD OFF THE SNAKE. THAT IS THE ONLY WAY WE GET OUR GOVERNMENT AND PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP BACK. LET'S DO THIS ON 2020🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸/20

  33. i gotta say i tend to believe Miller on this. No one denies that there is a deep state operative at work. everyone has covered it over the years. So when something like this happens we can't discount that possibiity. The timing is all too perfect and seems to follow along with this anti-trump narrative that has been going all along.

  34. So great and fresh to see actual Journalism and Chris pushing and arguing the other side. Provides a dialogue and debate and not a fake news show

  35. Hey Chris, wonder what you think about the bias of the whistleblower now that you know that they went to Schiff and had him help write the report prior to becoming a whistleblower?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *